<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Hello World - Latest Comments in General</title><link>http://calamityjake.disqus.com/</link><description>Time Makes Fools of Us All</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:58:59 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Death to Twitter&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Older&amp;#8221; Button</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/15/death-to-twitters-older-button/#comment-1477827</link><description>Invite sent!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Nassi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:58:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death to Twitter&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Older&amp;#8221; Button</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/15/death-to-twitters-older-button/#comment-1477337</link><description>Jason:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting. Well, as you say, plenty of Twitter's direct (and indirect) competitors have much more useful interfaces/APIs, but as long as Twitter has the lion's share of users it'll be hard to dislodge. For example, FriendFeed can do everything Twitter can, and much more, but outside of my geekiest friends nobody uses it (and if few people use *FriendFeed*, it's safe to say that almost nobody's using Plurk or any other competitors, either). And as long as all my friends are on Twitter, I will be, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So I guess my point is that Twitter is in a lucky position, because of the network effect of its critical mass of users, and now that they seem to have at least muffled the uptime problem I'm hoping they'll start addressing some of the more glaring interface problems. If they don't do it, and soon, I'm pretty sure Facebook is going to figure out a way to make its status feature as easy to use and ubiquitous as Twitter ever was.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't know anything about Socialthing, but if you can send me an invite I'll definitely check it out (calamityjake at gmail dot com). Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:11:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Death to Twitter&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;Older&amp;#8221; Button</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/15/death-to-twitters-older-button/#comment-1477276</link><description>Jake,&lt;br&gt;Some of Twitter's competitors have the timeline functionality that you describe, like Plurk.  The problem there for me is that none/very few of the people I follow are using Plurk.  Twitter is the leader in the clubhouse, as far as I'm concerned.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Something you might want to try is Socialthing!  Aside from the way that it integrates various social networking services, it also has a different way of displaying updates that might be more to your liking.  Not the timeline concept, but you'll easily be able to see what's been updated since your last login.  They're in private beta (I can send you an invite), and have just been acquired by AOL.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jason Nassi</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 18:03:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since we last spoke</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/07/since-we-last-spoke/#comment-1131080</link><description>The gelatto place was on Denman for sure. Turn left when you walk out the door of Tanpopo and then keep an eye out. It is on the same side of the street and I remember yellow /orange decor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">snowmit</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 04:37:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since we last spoke</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/07/since-we-last-spoke/#comment-1127239</link><description>sweet.  i'll add them both to the list.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 20:59:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since we last spoke</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/07/since-we-last-spoke/#comment-1126168</link><description>To save you the googling: &lt;a href="http://www.tanpoporestaurant.ca/"&gt;http://www.tanpoporestaurant.ca/&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:24:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since we last spoke</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/07/since-we-last-spoke/#comment-1126151</link><description>Sushi: Tanpopo Japanese Restaurant (1122 *Denman* Street)--$24 for&lt;br&gt;everything on the menu, including a bunch of cooked stuff as well as basic&lt;br&gt;sushi options.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gelato: I don't remember the name of the place, but I think it's also on&lt;br&gt;Denman. I highly recommend the green apple, grapefruit, and lime basil&lt;br&gt;sorbettos. We didn't even make it to the real gelato section.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:22:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Since we last spoke</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/07/since-we-last-spoke/#comment-1126109</link><description>where did you have sushi and gelato?  i'm heading up thataway in a couple weeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kat</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:17:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tilting at Windbags?</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/02/tilting-at-windbags/#comment-1098397</link><description>keep it up dude, good blog.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steveballmer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 04:38:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tilting at Windbags?</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/08/02/tilting-at-windbags/#comment-1083421</link><description>Hey, nice post. :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's good to read someone else's perspective on the whole thing (especially when it's someone I know and whose opinion I respect). I had NO IDEA the can of worms I was opening with that post, but I certainly don't mind having done it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tracy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 02:53:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m 3000 miles and 18 hours of testing away from a vacation.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/26/im-300-miles-and-18-hours-of-testing-away-from-a-vacation/#comment-1011728</link><description>i am hoping that you will not be too tired on the 7th because i have a non-seattle date on the 8th and then go on a three day hike on the 9th.  but if you are up for the 7th, i think we should hit the alibi room so i can take a picture of you adding a piece of gum to the gum wall. let me know if you want me to invite a few other seattle area bloggers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandon</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:51:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m 3000 miles and 18 hours of testing away from a vacation.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/26/im-300-miles-and-18-hours-of-testing-away-from-a-vacation/#comment-1008930</link><description>Thanks, kat.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:16:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m 3000 miles and 18 hours of testing away from a vacation.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/26/im-300-miles-and-18-hours-of-testing-away-from-a-vacation/#comment-1008895</link><description>good luck, jake!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kat</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:09:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: No original content today. Maybe in August.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/22/no-original-content-today-maybe-in-august/#comment-984886</link><description>i kept waiting for comic sans to show up and i thought it was going to be represented by someone tickity tack and gauche... NOT THE HERO.  COMIC SANS IS THE ANTI-HERO.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:06:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m pretty upset they omitted Starship Troopers.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/im-pretty-upset-they-omitted-starship-troopers/#comment-938800</link><description>Miller's Crossing is a great movie.  Its very Coen-y, perhaps a little too Coen-y for some people, but it is just a very well done movie - the plot is interesting, the acting is fantastic and, as with all Coen Brothers films, the sound and cinematography are first-rate.  I definitely would have it on my list.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unrelated, but I watched Barton Fink last night for the first time in years and that is another incredible early Coen Brothers movie.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wade</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:52:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m pretty upset they omitted Starship Troopers.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/im-pretty-upset-they-omitted-starship-troopers/#comment-921949</link><description>you should see blue velvet. it would probably be good to be a little drunk.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wip</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:47:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m pretty upset they omitted Starship Troopers.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/im-pretty-upset-they-omitted-starship-troopers/#comment-915184</link><description>I have never seen Miller's Crossing! Onto my netflix queue it goes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They also left off Ferris Bueller's Day Off, which if you're gonna put dumb comedies on the list is a pretty glaring omission. But, as you say, the omissions are basically the whole point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:43:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nobody cares about my other posts, however.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/nobody-cares-about-my-other-posts-however/#comment-915165</link><description>A) It is a cropped image of molten lava, which I picked because it matches the color scheme. I don't love it, but it's an improvement over the old design.&lt;br&gt;D) I will probably move again some other August, but hopefully not for a few more years. And I will never, NEVER, do it myself, no matter how much it costs.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:42:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m pretty upset they omitted Starship Troopers.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/im-pretty-upset-they-omitted-starship-troopers/#comment-906188</link><description>wow, i have seen most of these as well, and these lists are almost always better known for their omissions, because, otherwise, who would care? i mean, it's the 'I CAN'T BELIEVE THEY LEFT OFF (A) AND PUT IN (B)! ka-ching!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;still, three glaring omissions (unless my search function is not working): pan's labyrinth, english patient and good god i can't believe they left off Miller's Crossing! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;really, miller's crossing is just a perfect film.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brandon</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 02:35:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Nobody cares about my other posts, however.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/nobody-cares-about-my-other-posts-however/#comment-902129</link><description>A) nice redesign, I just saw it for the first time!  But what is that picture of in your masthead??&lt;br&gt;B)  I have definitely googled the ipod reset before...but it usually always happens when I'm not in front of a computer and forget how to do it.&lt;br&gt;C) I take personal pleasure in the Basedow post because I was a part of making it happen!  Also, I would still like to have it as my cell phone ring...&lt;br&gt;D) funny how on your ipod post, you also mention that you are moving in august.  and here you are two years later moving in august again.  i hate moving!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lauren</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:01:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I&amp;#8217;m pretty upset they omitted Starship Troopers.</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/15/im-pretty-upset-they-omitted-starship-troopers/#comment-896734</link><description>you are quite the movie watcher&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if i get ever break down and get netflix, this is a convenient little list&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i've only seen maybe 30%-40%</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:38:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100 best reads of the past 25 years</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/08/100-best-reads-of-the-past-25-years/#comment-850302</link><description>Blech. EW making a 100 best books list? They stick to Brangelina, mostly because this list #$()*-ing sucks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;J.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Julia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:59:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100 best reads of the past 25 years</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/08/100-best-reads-of-the-past-25-years/#comment-842214</link><description>goblet of fire over prisoner of azkaban?  stop ittttttt&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;i could see you hating love in the time of cholera&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;and... i can't wait to read again!!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 05:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100 best reads of the past 25 years</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/08/100-best-reads-of-the-past-25-years/#comment-837151</link><description>But I was an english major --I should really have read most of the "literature" on this list, if not the popular trash that made it on because it sold a lot of copies (looking at you, Da Vinci Code). I guess that's what retirement is for.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">calamityjake</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:29:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 100 best reads of the past 25 years</title><link>http://www.en-dash.com/blog/2008/07/08/100-best-reads-of-the-past-25-years/#comment-836941</link><description>i've read exactly three of these books, one of which i HATED.  busy or not, you're doing far better than i.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kat</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:04:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>